Língua Estrangeira (Inglês ou Espanhol) · Concurso PRF
Questão de Inglês — vocabulário, substituição de palavras e reescrita
Responda antes de revelar o gabarito comentado.
Questão 21 · Certo ou Errado
The number of people forced to flee their homes has reached record levels in recent years. Wars, persecution and, increasingly, the effects of extreme weather have pushed millions to cross borders in search of safety. Contrary to a widespread perception, however, most refugees do not travel to wealthy nations. The majority are hosted by low- and middle-income countries that share a border with the place they left.
International law makes a clear distinction between refugees and economic migrants. A refugee is someone who cannot return to his or her country because of a well-founded fear of persecution, and who is therefore entitled to protection. Under the principle of non-refoulement, states must not send such a person back to a place where his or her life or freedom would be threatened. Economic migrants, by contrast, move mainly to improve their living conditions and do not enjoy the same legal protection.
In practice, the line between the two groups is not always easy to draw. Many people leave for a mixture of reasons, and their journeys often expose them to smugglers, traffickers and other forms of exploitation. Border officials, therefore, face the difficult task of identifying who needs international protection while also controlling irregular entry.
Integration is another challenge. Studies show that refugees who are allowed to work and learn the local language soon after arriving tend to contribute more to the host economy and depend less on public assistance. Long waiting periods, on the other hand, can leave them idle for years, which harms both their mental health and their future job prospects. For this reason, several organisations have called for faster asylum procedures and earlier access to the labour market.
No trecho "states must not send such a person back to a place where his or her life or freedom would be threatened", a substituição de "must not" por "do not have to" preservaria o sentido original do texto.
Revelar gabarito
Gabarito: Errado
Errado. "Must not" expressa proibição (os Estados não podem devolver a pessoa), que é o núcleo do princípio do non-refoulement. "Do not have to" expressa ausência de obrigação (não precisam), o que tornaria a devolução facultativa e mudaria o sentido.
Mais questões de Inglês — vocabulário, substituição de palavras e reescrita
- Questão 22O trecho "Despite this progress, the transition is far from complete" poderia ser corretamente reescrito como Although this progress has been made, the transition is far from…
- Questão 23A expressão "far from complete", em "the transition is far from complete", poderia ser substituída por "nearly complete", sem alteração do sentido do texto.
- Questão 24No trecho "Weapons that enter a country illegally often end up in the hands of criminal organisations", o phrasal verb "end up" poderia ser substituído por "give up", sem…
- Questão 25No trecho "the elderly made up only a small fraction of the population", a forma verbal "made up" poderia ser substituída por "constituted", sem alteração do sentido do texto.
- Questão 26No trecho "products and services designed for people over 60", a substituição de "designed for" por "designed by" preservaria o sentido original do texto.
- Questão 1Em "some drivers turn to stimulants to stay awake", o "phrasal verb" "turn to" poderia ser substituído por "resort to", sem prejuízo do sentido do texto.